United States House of Representatives member Tom Emmer has reportedly suggested that regulating and encouraging innovation in the crypto space should not be a political win for either Democrats or Republicans.
According to an interview released Tuesday by Axios reporter Brady Dale, Emmermany of his colleagues in Congress were treating cryptocurrencies as a risk which merited warnings, rather than an investment opportunity for the United States. The U.S. lawmaker added that encouraging figures like FTX CEO to stay in the country will open more doors for residents rather than driving them away with regulatory uncertainty.
Emmer, whoagainst the “regulation by enforcement” approach some government agencies including the Securities and Exchange Commission have taken, reportedly questioned the partisan divide among crypto-related legislation and policies. A Republican, Emmer reportedly challenged claims made by Democratic Senator Elizabeth Warren, who has been one of the most outspoken critics on crypto in Congress, bank-provided crypto services, calling “the most dangerous part of the crypto world,” and equating crypto investments to scams with no consumer protection.
«I feel that [crypto] cannot be partisan,» said Emmer. «This is literally about looking at America and opportunities for Americans […] If you try to take all risk out of this stuff, well, you’re going to take away a lot of the opportunity […] It can either happen here in this country or it will happen somewhere else.”
Financial freedom is American freedom.
— Tom Emmer (@RepTomEmmer)
While the Minnesota representative said he may not want crypto regulation to be partisan, collaboration between Democrats and Republicans dropped in 2021 following the mob attack on the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6 according tofrom the Lugar Center and the McCourt School of Public Policy at Georgetown University. Emmer ranked as the 156th most bipartisan lawmaker out of 435 House members, with a negative score of -0.26955. In the Senate rankings, Warren scored even lower, at -0.79962.
“A negative score indicates that a member falls below the average of their group for the 20-year baseline period,” said the researchers. “A very negative score on the Bipartisan Index indicates that a member is giving little thought to working with the other party when he or she introduces bills and makes co-sponsorship decisions.”
Emmer didn’t stand alone — roughly 60% of senators from both sides of the aisle scored negative in 2021 according to the index, as did 75% of all U.S. House members. New Hampshire Senator Maggie Hassan, a Democrat, was ranked with the highest bipartisanship track record, and she previouslyin ransomware attacks.